Evaluation of three ELISAs for Mycobacterium avium ...
|Title||Evaluation of three ELISAs for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis using tissue and fecal culture as comparison standards|
|Author(s)||Shawn L. McKenna, Gregory P. Keefe, H. W. Barkema, D. C. Sockett|
|Abstract||Three serum ELISAs for detection of antibodies against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Mptb) were evaluated against culture of tissue and feces samples from 994 dairy cows collected at slaughter. Culture of ileum and associated lymph nodes for Mptb were positive for 160 (16.1%) of the 994 cows and 36 (3.6%) were fecal culture-positive for Mptb. Two of the ELISAs evaluated were absorbed indirect assays and the third was a non-absorbed indirect assay. Estimated sensitivities of the absorbed ELISAs when compared to tissue culture were 8.8% and 6.9%, while the unabsorbed ELISA had a sensitivity of 16.9%. Specificities were 97.6%, 96.0% and 90.8%, respectively. When compared to fecal culture, the sensitivities of the absorbed ELISAs were 16.6% and 13.9%, respectively, and the sensitivity of the unabsorbed ELISA was 27.8%. Specificities were 97.1%, 95.9% and 90.1%, respectively. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic curves for the absorbed ELISAs when tissue culture was the standard were 0.553 and 0.547, while the unabsorbed ELISA had an AUC of 0.540. When fecal culture was the comparison standard, the AUC of the absorbed ELISAs was 0.575 and 0.574, while the unabsorbed ELISA was 0.529. Overall, the sensitivities of the ELISAs when compared to tissue culture were low. The apparent advantage of the unabsorbed ELISA with respect to sensitivity is at the cost of lowered specificity and test accuracy.|
Using APA 6th Edition citation style.
Times viewed: 360